Brenda Lee Suits v. Little Motor Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
The question posed here is whether, under the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act [the Act], 1 the sale of a car by a transferor who knows that the odometer has “turned over,” i. e., recorded 99,999 miles and returned to 0, and fails to so indicate, manifests an intent to defraud. We hold that it does and that the transferor is therefore liable under the Act.
Appellant Brenda Lee Suits bought a car from appellee Little Motor Company [Little Motor] on June 14, 1977. The vehicle’s odometer showed 73 miles. Little Motor had purchased the vehicle some ten days…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Daniel Norman Ryan v. E. W. Edwards, Jr., Tappahannock Ford, Inc., John C. Duval, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Pepp v. Superior Pontiac GMC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
- Gerald Tinker v. Demaria Porsche-Audi, Inc. And Central National Bank of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bill Terry's Inc. v. Atlantic Motor Sales, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Lee v. Gallup Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Ryan Lavery v. R-K LeasingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Denmon v. Nick's Auto Sales of Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Boren v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988