Legal Opinion

Frost v. Standard Metal Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,539PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ball

Counsel for appellant contend, first, that the so-called guaranty is in legal effect simply an offer or proposal on the part of Frost to guarantee the purchases of George K. Harrington & Co.; second, that when there is a mere proposal to guarantee, there is no meeting of minds until the offer is accepted and notice is given to the guarantor of such acceptance; and third, that the so-called guaranty was limited to an account of $1,500, and that when goods to that amount had been sold to Harrington & Co. and that credit and amount had been cancelled by payment (as is the case here) it operated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Rindge v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Wright v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Tootle v. ElgutterNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Sickle v. MarshNew York Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. TH Davidson and Company v. Eidola ConcreteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API