McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Cotort, Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
The only question for our consideration in this case is whether there is credible and substantial evidence to support the findings. Beyond that we will not go. Industrial Commission v. Johnson, 64 Colo. 461, 172 Pac. 422; Passini v. Industrial Commission, 64 Colo. 349, 171 Pac. 369; Youngquist v. Industrial Commission, 67 Colo. 187, 184 Pac. 381.
Section 78 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Laws of 1915, page 566, provides for an action in the District Court to vacate, or modify, the findings or award of the commission “on the ground that the same is unlawful.” Section 81 of the same act,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Passini v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Industrial Commission v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Youngquist v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lucedale Veneer Co. v. RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
- Central Surety & Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Martin v. White Pine Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Industrial Commission v. W. A. Hover & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.