Legal Opinion
People v. Schunk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that certain of the conditions of probation imposed by County Court are not related to rehabilitation or are otherwise illegal. The conditions that defendant refrain from the use of alcohol and participate in alcohol treatment are “geared towards rehabilitating [defendant] because [they] relate [] to the correction of the underlying substance abuse problem at the root of defendant’s criminal behavior” (People v Letterlough, 86 NY2d 259, 266; see, People v Berkley, 152 AD2d 788, 789). We conclude that the other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. LetterloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. BerkleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. WahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- MEAD, JR., DONALD E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.