Legal Opinion

Central California Traction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 21, 1979No. 252-76Published

1Opinion of the CourtCowen, Senior Judge

The sole issue in this transportation case is whether a permissive counterclaim filed by the Government is barred by the statute of limitations. Resolution of the dispute requires an interpretation of the provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 16(3). These provisions were made a part of the Interstate Commerce Act by Pub. L. 85-762 enacted August 26, 1958 (72 Stat. 859).

Defendant contends that section 16(3)(c) is applicable and therefore that its counterclaim was timely filed. Plaintiff *467argues that the provisions of section 16(3)(i) govern and consequently that the counterclaim is barred by defendant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United States v. De Queen and Eastern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  3. R. E. Shutt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API