Central California Traction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtCowen, Senior Judge
The sole issue in this transportation case is whether a permissive counterclaim filed by the Government is barred by the statute of limitations. Resolution of the dispute requires an interpretation of the provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 16(3). These provisions were made a part of the Interstate Commerce Act by Pub. L. 85-762 enacted August 26, 1958 (72 Stat. 859).
Defendant contends that section 16(3)(c) is applicable and therefore that its counterclaim was timely filed. Plaintiff *467argues that the provisions of section 16(3)(i) govern and consequently that the counterclaim is barred by defendant’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. De Queen and Eastern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- R. E. Shutt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.