Legal Opinion
Septuagenarian v. Septuagenarian
New York City Family Court
Decided December 26, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jeffry H. Gallet, J.
FACTS
Petitioner requests support of $1,125 a month from her husband of 50 years. She convincingly supports her entitlement to that amount, in addition to her own monthly Social Security payment, by testimony and other evidence showing that it is the minimum amount required to maintain her modest standard of living.
*700This is not a normal adversarial support proceeding between estranged spouses. To the contrary, petitioner remains devoted to her husband and his care and visits him several times a week at the nursing home where he now resides.
Respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Estate of KummerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Glasberg v. GlasbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Summers v. D'EliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Albany County Department of Social Services v. EnglehardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Walsh v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Cuthbert S. v. Linda S.New York City Family Court · 1994
- Conrad v. HackettNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- Gomprecht v. GomprechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.