Armour & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge
This is a suit for refund of transportation taxes paid by the plaintiffs to several common carriers, the latter acting as collectors for the United States which received the taxes in due course. The taxes sought to be recovered related to the carrier’s charges, not for the line haul transportation of the plaintiff’s goods, but for so-called accessorial services furnished by the carrier, those services being the icing and salting of refrigerator cars, the heating of cars to protect the contents from freezing, and the unloading of cars.
This court has decided in the cases of Swift & Company v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Swift & Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Armour & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Beber v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
3Cited by9 opinions
- W. E. Cross, Trading as Virginia Tours and Gray Line of Richmond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- S. M. Jones v. The United States. S. M. Jones & Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Cross v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1962
- Benson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Chas. Abbate Co. v. JareckiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.