W. E. Cross, Trading as Virginia Tours and Gray Line of Richmond v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
The Federal 10% impost on transportation fares 1 , the District Court has concluded, was not assessable on the amounts paid the Gray Line of Richmond, Virginia, for its bus tours in sightseeing and visiting the City’s historic and other points of interest. Therefore, the Government is ordered to refund the “penalty” exacted by the tax statute and paid under protest by Gray Line for its failure to collect from the passengers and remit to the Government the excise claimed for 1957 and 1958. The United States appeals and, we hold, successfully.
Ground for his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reinecke v. SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Edward J. Bloom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. PfisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Lightsey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- The Gray Line Company, a Corporation v. R. C. Granquist, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Robert G. Dudley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Datlof v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Henry Thomas Turpin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Braden v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.