Legal Opinion
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 2003No. D040790PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Real parties in interest Lucinda D. Keller, Wilbur L. Keller and 7-Eleven, Inc. (licensees), are holders of a liquor license issued by petitioner Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). A clerk at a store operated by licensees sold an alcoholic beverage to a minor acting as a police decoy. ABC suspended the license for 10 days. Respondent Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (Appeals Board) reversed, finding that while the police required their decoy to make a face-to-face identification of the clerk as required by California Code of Regulations, title 4,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Phelps v. StostadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Provigo Corp. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. Carlos M.California Court of Appeal · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017