Legal Opinion

Goodson v. Rfs Ecusta

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided February 12, 2004No. I.C. NO. 944502Published

1Opinion of the Court

Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with references to the errors assigned and the briefs of the parties, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Hall.

The Full Commission finds as a fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS

1. Plaintiff was employed by defendant P.H. Glatfelter Company…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Arkansas Trucking Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Cauble v. . TrexlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Roth v. McCord & DellingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Tucker v. Workable Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Roberts v. City Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API