Legal Opinion

Roque v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1983No. 9 Appeal Docket, E.D. 1982PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Chief Justice.

At issue on this appeal is whether an insured died by “accidental means” for purposes of a double-indemnity clause of a policy of life insurance when the insured was shot and killed by a police officer as the insured pointed a gun at the officer during the commission of a burglary. Because the record demonstrates that the insured’s death was not accidental, we reverse the order of the Superior Court, 292 Pa.Super. 117, 436 A.2d 1033, and remand the record to the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna Coun ty with the direction that summary judgment be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mohn v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Eisenman v. HORNBERGERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Roque v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cole v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. No. 97-1282Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. PipherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Kirkpatrick v. AIU InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API