Legal Opinion

People v. Albert

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1928No. Docket No. 1021PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The information contains four separate charges of perjury. The defendant was convicted of the offenses charged in the first and fourth counts. His motion for a new trial was denied and he was sentenced to imprisonment for both offenses, the terms of imprisonment to run concurrently. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying a new trial. The respondent admits inability to find any corroboration of the testimony of the prosecuting witness in support of the fourth count and a careful search of the record fails to disclose any corroboration thereof.

The first count alleges that in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. Phillips.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. People v. DunstanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. People v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. In Re BraynardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  2. People v. MacKenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. PustauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API