Legal Opinion

Taccetta v. Scotto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered August 3, 2000, as, upon an order of the same court dated *708January 3, 2000, inter alia, granting the motion by the respondents, Christopher J. Scotto and Jill L. Scotto, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Pagano v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Mariaca-Olmos v. MizrhyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kaminsky v. WaldnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Temple v. DohertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Seymour v. RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Positko v. KrawiecAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Mangum v. TrabulsiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API