City of Wichita Falls v. Continental Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.
This court, before at-
tempting to decide the questions involved on this appeal, certified to the honorable Supreme Court of Texas the two questions below set out. We submitted, along with such questions a substantial statement of the matters of fact, shown by the record. As it is customary with the Supreme Court to publish the certificate in full, we presume it will be done in this case (see 1 S.W.(2d.) 596), and therefore refer to the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, answering the questions propounded by us, for a statement of the case, making such additional statements when necessary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Gilbert v. ShowermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Scruggs v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Scott v. Champion Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Gulf Refining Co. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Lombardo v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- McEachern v. Town of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.