Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Fort Worth Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 10, 1942No. 14408PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This case involves a question of unauthorized practice of law.

The suit is brought by Hal P. Hughes! In the plaintiff’s original petition John W. Myers is named as defendant, but, following proper suggestion of death, plaintiff’s first amended petition names as defendant the Fort Worth National Bank, as independent executor of Mr. Meyers’ estate.

The independent executor answered by plea in abatement, asserting that plaintiff did not have the capacity to maintain the suit, and that the suit should be dismissed, because the cause of action is based upon acts of plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. R.I. Bar Asso. v. Auto. Service Asso.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
  3. Kirk v. HeadTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Rhode Island Bar Ass'n v. Automobile Service Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
  5. Berk v. State Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re GuttierezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2000
  2. Palmer v. Unauthorized Practice Committee of the State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. J. R. Phillips Inv. Co. v. Road Dist. No. 18 of Limestone CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Chester McKinzie v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. Davies v. Unauthorized Practice Committee of the State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API