Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1983No. 18180PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This case turns on whether theft is a lesser included offense of aggravated robbery on the facts of this case.

The relationship of lesser included offenses is significant for two purposes. “A defendant [1] may be convicted of an offense included in the offense charged [2] but may not be convicted of both the offense charged and the included offense.” U.C.A., 1953, § 76-1-402(3). In other words, conviction of a lesser included offense (1) is permitted as an alternate to the charged offense, but (2) is not permitted as an addition to it. This case involves the second issue —…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. United States v. Mike HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. State in Interest of LGWUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. ElliottUtah Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. LaroccoUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API