Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Rowe

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1930No. 27159PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the district court sustaining separate demurrers of the defendants.

To make clear the situation, it is necessary to state plaintiff’s pleading rather fully. The pleading to which the defendants demur was a motion filed in the original case in which the judgment was entered in the district court for Lancaster county and was entitled “Motion to set aside satisfaction of judgment.” The motion consisted of twelve paragraphs and was duly verified. It had all the forms of a petition. In the final order herein, on plaintiff’s refusing to plead further and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. KuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Knaak v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Coad v. DorseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Fox v. State ex rel. PowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hanna v. BergquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall v. RoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Branham v. AyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API