Legal Opinion

Huron Printing & Bindery Co. v. Kittleson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Beadle county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Action to recover the possession of personal property alleged to have been wrongfully taken from plaintiffs by defendants. Defendants had judgment, from which and an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBennett, P. J.

This action is one brought by the plaintiff, the Huron Printing & Bindery Company, to recover, the possession of certain printing materials and machinery, enumerated and described in the complaint. The plaintiff alleges that on August 9, 1889, it was the owner and in possession of that property, and that it was wrongfully taken from it by the defendants. The defendants contend that the property was not, and never had been, the property of the plaintiff, but that it was owned by one Charles Kittleson, and that it was taken by the defendants for said Charles Kittleson, as his agent; and deny…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Chicago West Division Railway Co. v. BeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bogert v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Lander v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Mayes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lea v. Iron Belt Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. McCrillis v. a & W ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Engler v. Ipswich Printing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bryan v. Northwest Beverages, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Chase v. Redfield Creamery Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API