Legal Opinion

United States v. Peterson

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 8, 2010No. CV 08-3160Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 13) (Government Motion) and Defendants Randal J. Peterson and Valera L. Peterson’s Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 14) (Peterson Motion). The Government brought this action to recover erroneously paid refunds from the Petersons’ 1997 and 2002 joint income tax returns, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7405. For the reasons set forth below, the Motions are allowed in part and denied in part.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The Petersons are married and filed joint income tax returns…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API