Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chittum
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stephenson
The principal issue we consider in this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. We also consider whether the trial court erred in refusing to deduct the plaintiff’s pension contributions in calculating his net income.
I
Plaintiff, James L. Chittum, filed a motion for judgment under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (the Act or FELA), against his employer, Norfolk and Western Railway Company (N & W), seeking recovery of damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by N & W during the course of his employment. N & W…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Cowden v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. SumnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
- Billy K. Pomeroy v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.