Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Brock

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1904No. 13,627PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, 0. J.:

J. T. Brock recovered a judgment against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company for $7000, for personal injuries sustained because of the alleged negligence of the company. In his petition he averred that, in traveling over a highway with which he was unfamiliar, it became necessary *449for Mm to cross the railroad track; that east of the crossing the railroad runs through a deep cut, and that, in the same direction and- near the crossing, there is a curve in the railroad; that the embankments around the curve and along the cut are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MoffattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. BrockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. First Nat. Bank of Seminole v. HenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Johnson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API