Legal Opinion

Cutting v. Bullerdick

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1951No. 12324_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to a written contract entered into between one Russell W. Smith and appellant, Audrey Cutting, the said Russell W. Smith erected a house on a lot situate in Anchorage, Alaska. In the contract Audrey Cutting was designated the owner of the lot. Smith built the house but became involved in financial difficulties and as a result was unable to pay the laborers and materialmen furnishing labor and supplies. Liens were filed against the property pursuant to the provisions of 1 Alaska Compiled Laws, Annotated, § 26-1-5 (1949), and in due time suit was instituted for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ingersoll v. . MangamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Crouter v. . CrouterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Ford v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. Russell v. HaynerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API