Russell v. Hayner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge
(after making the foregoing statement). Did the court err in sustaining the demurrer and in entering judgment against the appellants?
The act relating to mechanics’ liens should be liberally construed. The evident spirit and purpose of the act is *275to do substantial justice to all parties who may he affected by its provisions, and the courts should avoid unfriendly strictness and mere technicality. Springer Land Ass’n v. Ford, 168 U.S. 513, 18 S.Ct. 170, 42 L.Ed. 562; Salt Lake H. Co. v. Chainman M. & E. Co. (C.C.) 128 F. 509; Hooven v. Featherstone’s Sons, 111 F. 81, 91, 49 C.C.A. 229. But in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Davis v. AlvordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gould v. WiseNevada Supreme Court · 1884
- Springer Land Assn. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Malter v. Falcon Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Volker-Scowcroft Lumber Co. v. VanceUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. Wong WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
- Arctic Lumber Co. v. BordenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Clay v. SandalAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- United States ex rel. Samuel Hastings Co. v. LowranceDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.