Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Moya

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1992No. 22013PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

An insured died from injuries she suffered in a car accident caused by an uninsured motorist. Respondents/cross-appellants (“the Moyas”), the insured’s personal representative and survivors, sought the “each occurrence” limit under the insurer’s uninsured motorists provision. They also attempted to stack the death and dismemberment benefit. The district court granted each party partial summary judgment, ruling that the Moyas were entitled to the “each occurrence” limit and that the death and dismemberment benefit was not subject to stacking. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Odie Joe Reid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. Abellon v. Hartford InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Tore, Ltd. v. ChurchNevada Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Siggelkow v. Phoenix InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Grand Hotel Gift Shop v. Granite State InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Davis v. FoleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bish v. Guaranty National InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. DahlheimerWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API