Legal Opinion

United States v. Pennington

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 16, 2023No. 5:21-cv-00198Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 5:21-CV-198-REW-MAS v. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER VEARL PENNINGTON, & ) MICHAEL WILLIAMSON, ) ) Defendants. *** *** *** *** Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. See DE 36, 37, 38. For the following reasons, and upon consideration of the full record, the Court GRANTS the United States’s motion and DENIES Defendants’ motions. The forfeiture is enforced as ordered. I. Background a. Factual Background This matter arises from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API