United States v. Juren
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellants challenge a judgment of the District Court, Judge Gesell, requiring compliance with subpoenas requested by the Department of Energy (DOE) and denying limited discovery on the issue of the propriety of the subpoenas. Because appellants have presented no evidence that DOE acted improperly, we affirm.
DOE has broad authority to issue subpoenas ad testificandum under Section 206 of the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, 12 U.S.C. § 1904 note (1976), as *494amended, incorporated by Section 5(a)(1) of the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, 15 U.S.C. § 754(a)(1) (1976), as amended;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1980
3Cited by10 opinions
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. BrownDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
- United States v. Andrew E. Hill and J.E. Pinkerton, United States of America v. Dennis Juren, United States of America v. Edward W. CromeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Thriftyman, Inc.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
- Spannaus v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- United States v. RFB Petroleum, Inc.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.