Legal Opinion

Charles P. Adkins and Jane E. Adkins v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 11, 2013No. 10-851TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Plaintiffs Charles D. and Jane E. Adkins are victims of a fraudulent investment scheme, and seek a refund of federal income taxes based on the losses they sustained due to the scheme. The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. Plaintiffs claim that the undisputed facts demonstrate that they suffered a theft loss of $2,575,958.19 in 2004, and that they are therefore entitled to a total income tax refund of $317,458. Defendant concedes that plaintiffs incurred a theft loss of $2,336,895.58, but contends that the undisputed facts establish that the balance…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Rochlis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API