Charles P. Adkins and Jane E. Adkins v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Plaintiffs Charles D. and Jane E. Adkins are victims of a fraudulent investment scheme, and seek a refund of federal income taxes based on the losses they sustained due to the scheme. The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. Plaintiffs claim that the undisputed facts demonstrate that they suffered a theft loss of $2,575,958.19 in 2004, and that they are therefore entitled to a total income tax refund of $317,458. Defendant concedes that plaintiffs incurred a theft loss of $2,336,895.58, but contends that the undisputed facts establish that the balance…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Rochlis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020