Hunt v. Nolen
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aldrich, J., Spartanburg, April, 1895. This was an action in foreclosure commenced January 21, 1891, by Amanda C. Hunt and' Marie Hunt against W. R. Nolen. The case went to the Supreme Court {Hunt v. Nolen, 40 S. C., 284), which ordered that J. P. Cleveland should be made a party defendant, and the case now comes up in that condition, both parties appealing.
Read the full summary
Before Aldrich, J., Spartanburg, April, 1895. This was an action in foreclosure commenced January 21, 1891, by Amanda C. Hunt and' Marie Hunt against W. R. Nolen. The case went to the Supreme Court {Hunt v. Nolen, 40 S. C., 284), which ordered that J. P. Cleveland should be made a party defendant, and the case now comes up in that condition, both parties appealing. The following is so much of the decree of Judge Aldrich as pertains to the construction of the trust deed, which is the principal point in the case: I will next consider the aforesaid deed of H. H. Thomson to Dr. Wm. C. Bennett,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff against the defendant, Nolen, to foreclose a mortgage given for part of the purchase money of the land described in the complaint. J. F. Cleveland was afterwards made a party defendant, as will hereafter appear. On the 15th day of July, 1889, the plaintiffs executed and delivered to the defendant, Nolen, a deed of conveyance of 200 acres of land on Fair Forest Creek, in the county and State aforesaid, with the usual covenants of warranty. The purchase money of the said tract of land was…
2Cited by4 opinions
- First Carolinas Joint S.L. Bk. of Cola. v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Bank of Prosperity v. DominickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Morris v. LainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Holden v. MelvinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917