Kraft v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
(Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, Sever, and Stay, and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand)
JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge.
Pending before the court are the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Docket 3], the defendants’ Motion to Sever [Docket 5], the defendants’ Motion to Stay [Docket 8], and the plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand to State Court [Docket 12]. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED except as to the two Texas plaintiffs, Rose Kraft and Sandra Huss; the Motion to Sever is DENIED as moot; the Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot; and the Motion to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farrar v. Cessna Aircarft CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2019