Legal Opinion

Maier's Bakery v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Maier’s Bakery (Employer) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) denying Employer’s petition to modify compensation payable to Russell Sandt (Claimant). We affirm.

Claimant sustained a work-related injury on February 22, 1995. Employer accepted liability for the injury by way of a notice of compensation payable that provided for compensation at the weekly rate of $509.00, based on an average weekly wage of $1087.91.

At the time of his injury, Claimant was one of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Pennsylvania Power Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API