Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Boyd v. Tone
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 2024No. 2023-1140PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 496.] THE STATE EX REL . BOYD, APPELLANT, v. TONE, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Boyd v. Tone,
2024-Ohio-1703.] Prohibition—Inmate had adequate remedies in ordinary course of law to raise alleged defect in plea colloquy—Trial court did not patently and unambiguously lack subject-matter jurisdiction to convict inmate—Court of appeals’ dismissal of complaint affirmed. (No. 2023-1140—Submitted March 26, 2024—Decided May 7, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Erie County, No. E-23-0022,
2023-Ohio-2802.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Boyd v. ToneOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- McDermott v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024