Legal Opinion

United States v. Seth Bonsu, Also Known as Quincy

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 16, 2003No. 02-1348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

After bouncing between psychiatric diagnoses that found him alternately competent and incompetent to stand trial, Seth Bonsu was eventually found competent and tried and convicted by a jury of one count of conspiring to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and seven counts of distributing heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He now insists that the government coerced him to testify falsely before the grand jury. In addition, he argues that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conspiracy conviction and that he was improperly denied a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Scott FranzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Carolyn Kay PoffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Stephanie Hartmann and Eva Hartmann v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Debra Hartmann, and Harvey LoochtanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Uvaldo ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Bonsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Reyes, UvaldoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API