Medinol Ltd. v. Cordis Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Medinol Ltd. (“Medinol”) brings this patent infringement action against Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, “Cordis”). On June 13, 2013, I granted defendants’ request to bifurcate the case in order to address Cor-dis’s equitable defense of laches prior to starting discovery on the merits. I held a bench trial on the issue of laches from January 20 to January 24, 2014. The parties made post-trial submissions on January 31, 2014, Pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, I make the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Stuart R. Meyers v. Asics Corp., and Asics Tiger Corp., and Hyde Athletics IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Katz v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (PC) Butler v. KelsoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Medinol Ltd. v. Cordis CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Ready Capital Corporation v. READY CAPITAL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021