State v. Johnson
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
J. JONES, Justice.
Daniel Johnson petitioned the district court for an exemption from sex offender registration requirements. The district court determined that the 2009 amendments to the Idaho Sexual Offender Registration Notification and Community Righb-to-Know Act (SORA) precluded such exemption and therefore denied his petition. On appeal, Johnson argues that the district court’s application of SORA was unconstitutional. Because Johnson filed his petition in his already-dismissed criminal ease, however, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the matter. We therefore vacate the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. LindquistIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. DonatoIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. JakoskiIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Timothy Alan Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Peterson v. GundersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2022
- Philip L. Hart v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Ronald John Huntsman, Sr. v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Alex Paul GiovanilliIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.