Rooks v. Booth
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Assumpsit by Horace W. Rooks against Minnie C. Booth for breach of a contract of leasing. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
As stated in the record:
“This is an action in assumpsit, brought by plaintiff for the breach of an alleged oral agreement to extend a subsisting written lease existing between the parties for one year.”
Plaintiff’s proofs tended to show that the oral agreement was made in August, 1907, to extend the term of his written lease, which expired September 1, 1907, upon the same conditions and agreements as therein contained, including the rent of $600 per annum. Defendant denied the making of the oral agreement as claimed. The undisputed evidence shows that on May 14, 1907, defendant entered into a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jarrait v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Whiting v. OhlertMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Taylor v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Waldo v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fera v. Village Plaza, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Couyoumjian v. BrimageMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Bell v. VaughnArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Whalen v. GalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Fera v. Village Plaza, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974