Legal Opinion

Wilds v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 21, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00508Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JOHNNY WILDS, Case No. 1:22-cv-508 Petitioner, Cole, J. vs. Litkovitz, M.J. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE REPORT AND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, RECOMMENDATION Respondent. Petitioner, an inmate in state custody at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is before the Court on the petition, respondent’s return of writ, and petitioner’s reply. (Doc. 1, 14, 15). For the reasons stated below, the petition should be denied. I. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API