Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1904No. 20,157PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom White Circuit Court; T. F. Palmer, Judge. Mandamus by the State on the relation of Elmer R. Bringham against the Board of Commissioners of Newton county. Erom a judgment for relator, respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Hadley, J.-

— This is a mandate proceeding to compel the board of commissioners of Newton county to let a contract and build a court-house at Goodland, in said county. The complaint and alternative writ state the same facts which the circuit court held sufficient on demurrer. The appellant answered in four special paragraphs, each of which the court held insufficient on demurrer, and ordered appellant “to let the contract for and cause a court-house to be constructed at the town of Goodland without delay.” The action is grounded on a proceeding to relocate the county seat under the provisions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stout v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Holt v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kraus v. LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Board of Commissioners v. AlbrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bullock v. RobisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Caesar v. DeVAULT, TWP. TRUSTEE, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Crist v. MolonyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API