Legal Opinion

H. J. Baker & Bro. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 30, 1948No. C. D. 1131PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

These are protests arising at the port of New York against the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise, invoiced as sunflower seed meal, imported from Uruguay on November 30 and December 12, 1944, at tlie rate of three-tenths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 730 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as vegetable oil-cake meal, not specially provided for. The protests claim that the merchandise is free of duty under paragraph 1685 as a substance used chiefly for fertilizer, or chiefly as an ingredient in the manufacture of fertilizer, or that it is dutiable at 5 per centum ad valorem…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. H. J. Baker & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API