Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Countrywide Securities Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 26, 2013No. Case Nos. 2:11-ML-02265-MRP, 2:12-CV-08558-MRPPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order Re Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint

MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Guaranty Bank was a federally insured depository institution that failed after the 2007 and 2008 financial crisis. The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), codified in Title 12 of the United States Code, authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to act as receiver for failed depository institutions. As a result of the financial crisis, the FDIC was appointed as receiver to various failed banks across the country, including…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kubbernus v. ECAL Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Mortgage-Backed Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  3. FDIC v. RhodesNevada Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API