Munroe v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
When we speak of the defendant, we include its predecessors. Defendant acquired the récord title to a 30-foot right of way across block 326 in the city of Muskegon in 1871, and has occupied and used a strip of land on each side of it across said block for many years. In this action of ejectment, plaintiffs seek to recover possession of these strips of land. It is conceded that they have the record title thereto. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Findings of fact were made, from which the court concluded as a matter of law that defendant had acquired title by adverse possession.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grand Rapids, Lansing & Detroit Railroad v. ChesebroMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. MarbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Felton v. WedthoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Chapin v. HuntMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Township of Jasper v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Gardner v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Smith v. FeneleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Rozmarek v. PlamondonMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Michigan Central Railroad v. Garfield Petroleum Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.