Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Cross

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1983No. 83-194PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellee, Barry Cross, filed suit for damages sustained from an assault by appellant, Perry Johnson, Jr. The trial court, sitting as a jury, found that appellee had suffered $380.00 in damages for medical expenses and $7,500.00 in damages for pain and suffering. The award for pain and suffering was then reduced by one-third because of the comparative fault of appellee. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was denied and he has appealed. We affirm. Jurisdiction to decide cases presenting a question in the law of torts is in this Court. Rule 29(1) (o).

The motion for a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Landis v. HastingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Juvenile H. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Reager Ex Rel. Reager v. AndersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Egg City of Arkansas, Inc. v. RushingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Kratzke v. Nestle-Beich, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Olmstead v. MoodySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API