Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 27, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOREMEN, Justice.

Appellee, Pascal Smith, obtained a judgment for an injury received while working in a mine. The judgment was against appellant, Roy Skinner who,' appellee claimed, was'his employer and who was. eligible to operate, but was not operating, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act at- the time of the injury.

*622The appellant urges reversal on the ground that the court erred in failing to sustain a motion for a directed verdict for appellant because (1) the relationship of master and servant did not exist; (2) appellant was not eligible to operate under the Workmen’s Compensation Act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. High Splint Coal Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Ward v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  3. Duvin Coal Company v. FikeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Hazard Coal Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Howard v. Southern Harlan Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stinnett v. BucheleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  2. Baker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Jones v. City of Bowling GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  4. Fitch v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  5. Wade v. Scott Recycling, L.L.C.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API