Legal Opinion
Fitch v. Mayer
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 5, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Commissioner.
The appellant, Mrs. Loretta Fitch, instituted this action against the appellees, Frances and William Mayer, d/b/a White Crescent System, for damages resulting from injuries received while performing her duties -as a waitress in appellees’ restaurant. At the conclusion of the appellant’s proof the court directed the jury to find a verdict for appellees. This appeal is from the judgment entered pursuant to the directed verdict.
Mrs. Fitch described the accident causing her injuries as follows:
“Well I had a customer come in and ask for coffee; I walked over to where we keep…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wigginton's Adm'r v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Ward v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- E. J. O'Brien & Co. v. Shelton's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Helton v. Gunn Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Mannington Fuel Co. v. Ray's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sykes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Darnell v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
- Lawrence v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Engle Coal Co. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958