Aplin v. Board of Supervisors
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applies for mandamus to compel respondent to apportion among the 'several townships for assessment the amount of indebtedness from the county to the State. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Petition for mandamus.
Mandamus is asked by the relator, as Auditor General of this State, to compel the board of supervisors of Shiawassee county to apportion among the several townships in said county the sum of $12,832.30, claimed to be owing by said county to the State.
•It is claimed in the petition that on September 28, 1887, the relator sent to the clerk of said board a statement showing the amount of State tax apportioned to said county, with the following notice:
“ There is also to be levied as a portion of the county taxes, as required by section 22, Act 153, Laws of 1885, unless paid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Ambler v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Aplin v. Van TasselMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People ex rel. Auditor General v. Supervisors of Monroe CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Canham v. MooneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Young v. HolgateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Auditor General v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Mason v. Supervisor of HazeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Begole v. BigelowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Motor General v. Monroe County TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911