Legal Opinion

Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. Conley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1976No. 52279PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quilllan, Judge.

This appeal arises out of suit brought by a husband and wife seeking to recover damages for injuries sustained by the wife when she fell in the corporate defendant’s store. The jury returned a verdict in favor of each of the plaintiffs. The defendant appeals, assigning error on the overruling of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and motion for new trial. Held:

1. It is contended that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict because the plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant had constructive knowledge of the presence of the wet substance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Banks v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Burger Barn, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Emory University v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Sharpton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Food Giant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Stouffer Corp. v. HenkelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Rodriguez v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. LEND LEASE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. ErfourthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API