Legal Opinion

Sharpton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1965No. 41491, 41492PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

As a general rule, when the defendant’s liability is based on constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition, the petition must allege facts and circumstances sufficient to make it a question of fact whether the alleged dangerous condition had existed for a sufficient length of time so that knowledge of it would be imputed to the defendant. Home Fed. Savings &c. Assn. v. Hulsey, 104 Ga. App. 123 (121 SE2d 311). The length of time which must exist to show that the defendant had an opportunity to discover the defect will vary with the circumstances of each case (nature of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BELK-GALLANT COMPANY v. CordellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. S. H. Kress & Co. v. FlaniganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Stowe v. GALLANT-BELK COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Telligman v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Begin v. Georgia Championship Wrestling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API