Presbyterian Church v. Plainfield Trust
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
All of the significant factual occurrences and events narrated by the bill of complaint, if regarded solely in their substantive character and denuded of all implications of guile or bad faith, are acknowledged to be true by the executors-trustees and by Mr. Fisher in their respective answers.
Recognizing for immediate purposes the facts in that aspect, the complainant asserts that the answers filed by those defendants fail as a matter of law to aver any adequate and effectual defenses to the prayers of the bill. In pursuit of that contention the complainant seeks the allowance of orders…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Wormley v. WormleySupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re HonigSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952