Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation v. Joseph Gutradt Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1926No. 4684PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

This was a libel filed by Joseph Gutradt Company, appellee here, against the Pacific Mail Steamship Company, for damages to cargo. The Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation, appellant, was the third party respondent, having been impleaded by the Pacific Mail Company, which prayed for judgment over on the ground that the cause of the damage to the cargo was the Bethlehem Corporation’s breach of a contract to repair the ship Ecuador. The decree was in favor of the Gutradt Company, libelant, against the Pacific Mail Company, with judgment over against the Bethlehem Corporation,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pan-American Petroleum Transp. Co. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Alaska Steamship Co. v. Pacific Coast Gypsum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Booth Steamship Co., Ltd., and Third Party v. Meier & Oelhaf Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. Hugev v. Dampskisaktieselskabet InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
  4. James Hagans v. Farrell Lines, Inc. v. Lavino Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. Arrow Stevedoring Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API