Legal Opinion

Shipley Construction & Supply Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 25, 1934No. 42131PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

This is a suit to recover an overpayment of $8,654.13 income and profits taxes for the fiscal year 1929.

The plaintiff alleges that the Commissioner admitted in writing the overpayment upon which suit is brought and promised to pay the same, by reason of which an account stated was created and the suit was brought in time. On behalf of the defendant it is insisted that no such promise was made, that no timely or proper claims for refund have been filed, and that plaintiff’s action is barred by the statute of limitations.

While two claims for refund were filed, we do not need to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. KaufmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Daube v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Daube v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Daube v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Olds & Whipple, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  2. Wood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  3. Goodenough v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  4. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  5. Braun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API