Edgar Herbert Vickery v. Fisher Governor Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
The action appealed from in this diversity case 1 is, first, the granting by the district court of appellee’s motion for summary judgment, and second, the denying of appellant’s motions to set aside the summary judgment and grant a new trial and to amend appellant’s first amended complaint for damages to add a new cause of action. Our jurisdiction to review the lower court’s action arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Appellant is a citizen of the State of California. From 1955 to 1960, he developed and sold a ball valve used principally in the aerospace industry. Patent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hamilton v. WosepkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Koepke v. FontecchioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Rasmus v. AO Smith CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
- Fidelity Savings Bank v. Wormhoudt Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Espinoza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Shiosaki v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation and McDonald Systems of California, Inc. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Landsberg v. Scrabble Crossword Game Players, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.