Legal Opinion

Edgar Herbert Vickery v. Fisher Governor Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1969No. 22593PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge:

The action appealed from in this diversity case 1 is, first, the granting by the district court of appellee’s motion for summary judgment, and second, the denying of appellant’s motions to set aside the summary judgment and grant a new trial and to amend appellant’s first amended complaint for damages to add a new cause of action. Our jurisdiction to review the lower court’s action arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Appellant is a citizen of the State of California. From 1955 to 1960, he developed and sold a ball valve used principally in the aerospace industry. Patent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Hamilton v. WosepkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Koepke v. FontecchioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Rasmus v. AO Smith CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  5. Fidelity Savings Bank v. Wormhoudt Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Shiosaki v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation and McDonald Systems of California, Inc. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Landsberg v. Scrabble Crossword Game Players, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API